Actively hunt for leads.
Monitor code, PRs, issues, build failures, deployments, and performance signals for patterns worth following.
OutputA structured lead with signals and affected components.Your repos are leaving clues.
LeadYard deploys autonomous engineering agents to discover, investigate, and resolve the technical problems hiding across your development stack. Connect your repositories, CI pipelines, issue trackers, and observability tools. LeadYard follows the signals, connects the evidence, and prepares actionable fixes — with your engineering team in control.
Three signals connect to one code path. Trace is gathering evidence and checking alternatives.
Your engineering stack, connected
Live from the Yard
It’s an investigation already in motion: connected signals, a probable cause, a proposed change, and a human review point. Explore the sample panel to see the shape of a LeadYard lead.
Illustrative investigation · Sample datav2.18.4.checkout/repository.ts:184 appears repeatedly in the order-processing path.Engineering blind spots
Signals are already in your stack. The connections between them still live in someone’s head.
GitHub knows what changed. CI knows what failed. Sentry knows what crashed. Datadog knows what slowed down. Jira knows what was reported.
A flaky test gets retried. A slow query slips through another release. A workaround spreads across services. An incident forms before anyone sees the pattern.
LeadYard follows the signal until the problem becomes actionable.The lead lifecycle
Specialized agents share context from discovery through verification, while your team keeps control of consequential decisions.
Monitor code, PRs, issues, build failures, deployments, and performance signals for patterns worth following.
OutputA structured lead with signals and affected components.Trace dependencies, inspect history, compare failures, test hypotheses, and surface what remains unknown.
OutputLikely cause, impact, evidence, and open questions.Draft code changes, regression tests, dependency updates, or a refactoring plan tied to the evidence.
OutputProposed patch and reproducible validation steps.Bring developers and agents into one Lead Room to question findings, review changes, and record decisions.
OutputOne shared investigation with clear ownership.Compare authorized test and monitoring signals with success criteria; reopen with context if the issue returns.
OutputResolution history and verification status.Your autonomous engineering crew
Purpose-built roles coordinate around each lead so investigation can move forward without losing its evidence or its human owners.
Examines CI failures, commits, issue trends, dependencies, and performance changes to uncover engineering leads.
Maps execution paths, checks Git history and traces, identifies affected services, and tests competing explanations.
Investigates duplicated functionality, architectural drift, circular dependencies, and risky service coupling.
Prepares code changes, refactoring plans, dependency modifications, and regression tests linked to the evidence.
Runs authorized tests and benchmarks, reviews CI outcomes, and checks agreed success criteria.
Breaks leads into tasks, coordinates agents, tracks dependencies, and escalates decisions that need a person.
Built for human + AI collaboration
Investigations get scattered across chat, code review, terminals, dashboards, and undocumented assumptions. Lead Rooms bring the evidence, owners, agents, and proposed changes into one shared workspace.
Illustrative product concept · No live workspace
What LeadYard hunts
Follow recurring patterns across repositories and tools to make hidden engineering work easier to see and act on.
Connect error signatures, CI runs, change history, and prior fixes to investigate why a bug returns.
Example: A serialization error resurfaces across releases after earlier patches.Surface coupled, frequently changed modules with recurring defects, duplicated code, and workarounds.
Example: Diverging validation logic causes inconsistent behavior across services.Connect performance telemetry with deployments, code changes, queries, and benchmarks.
Example: Worker memory rises after an update under a specific load pattern.Analyze module boundaries, service dependencies, circular references, and architectural drift.
Example: A shared utility becomes a tightly coupled dependency across services.Group flaky tests, recurring build failures, dependency conflicts, and environment issues.
Example: Parallel test runs expose shared-state mutation.Investigate outdated packages, blocked upgrades, incompatible interfaces, and dependency chains.
Example: One deprecated package blocks a runtime upgrade across services.Not just AI-assisted. Agent-operated.
LeadYard plans an investigation, selects tools, gathers evidence, delegates parallel work, and surfaces what it still needs to know.
Find the causes of recurring CI failures in the payments repository.
Investigate why our API latency has increased over the last two releases.
Prepare a fix for LEAD-2048 and request a review.
Autonomous investigation. Controlled execution. Human-owned decisions.
One platform. Your engineering context.
Link signals across your connected systems so a commit, build, issue, or trace can become part of a larger investigation.
Integration availability and permissions depend on the configured workspace and plan. Documentation sources may include Markdown, repository docs, and internal knowledge sources.
Autonomy with boundaries
Give agents room to investigate. Define what they can execute, what needs approval, and which evidence supports each recommendation.
Begin with inspection of repositories, logs, and connected engineering systems.
Configure which agents can run tests, create branches, or prepare pull requests.
Require human approval before consequential actions, merges, or production changes.
Review source references, assumptions, confidence, and validation status.
Track agent actions, delegated tasks, tool use, and human decisions.
Limit agents to repositories, services, and tools required for assigned work.
Built for engineering teams
Give each role a clearer view of emerging technical risk and the work that can improve the system.
See recurring problems and high-impact maintenance beyond the manually created backlog.
Prioritize architecture work, delegate investigations, and review evidence-backed proposals.
Investigate systemic reliability, performance, and CI issues across connected services.
Spend less time gathering context and more time evaluating and validating fixes.
Pricing
Early access is shaped around the repositories, integrations, and investigation goals your team wants to start with.
We’ll learn how your engineering team works, where the signals live, and what an agent should help investigate. Scope and commercial details can follow that conversation.
A few good questions
Control, evidence, and human review are part of the product from the start.
Discovery is read-only by default. Teams can configure permitted actions, and consequential changes can require explicit human approval. Merges and production changes remain human decisions.
A lead is a structured problem worth investigating: it connects signals to affected systems, evidence, a hypothesis, and a possible next action. It is more than an alert or an untriaged ticket.
Investigations should link back to relevant source evidence, show assumptions and confidence, and include unresolved questions or alternative explanations when the evidence is incomplete.
No. The Lead-2048 panel and Yard board are illustrative product concepts with sample data. This page does not connect to repositories, CI, or observability services.
There’s more hiding in your codebase.
Let your agents find it, investigate it, and build a proposed fix. Bring your team into the room.